"I would not want to public policy issues were used to cover the severe economic crisis affecting our country and, in particular, is approaching the threshold of poverty whole groups of citizens. You can also disagree about the reasons for student protest (in the case of the right hand there are many shared points contained in the complaint), but we still ensure that it can be exercised with full freedom and protected against possible provocations.
The standoff against the government is implementing that part of the students who took to the streets against the Gelmini reform risks to pay the student protest with the social problems, giving breath to the left that had become marginalized and no longer credible even to represent the rights of the weakest sectors.
The determination with which you want to oppose the demonstration of the students would be better to use it against bankers and operators of high finance, by unscrupulous operations, have crippled businesses and households.
's always been a mistake to open up a clash with students, because young people are mobilized when dealing with schools and universities can also use the pretext of questionable motives. When this happens, there is evidently a deeper malaise, that young people are able to sense before the rest of the population.
Repression end in itself result is always the worst way to compare institutions and young people. And if, despite past experiences, now you want to set out on this road, it is hoped to prevent a much broader social protest.
would still make liberal use of power against each other, the young soldiers per thousand € per month wear a uniform and intimidated students from the brink of unemployment. Generational fractures such as these are likely to be incurable and can lead to deviations dangerous to society. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment